Hyperresponsiveness of the Mucosal Barrier in Crohnʼs Disease Is Not Tumor Necrosis Factor-Dependent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with gut barrier dysfunction. Besides the baseline barrier defect, a subgroup of patients also expresses an intestinal barrier hyperresponsiveness to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We studied whether reducing inflammation and restoring gut barrier dysfunction with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody treatment also antagonizes the permeability increase by oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake in patients with CD. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy control subjects and 25 patients with active CD were studied. The 31 controls performed intestinal permeability testing for Cr-EDTA before (baseline) and after oral intake of indomethacin (50 + 75 mg). Twenty-five patients carried out a baseline and indomethacin-mediated permeability test before infliximab infusion. The patients repeated either the indomethacin test (12/25) or baseline and indomethacin tests (13/25), 1 month after this treatment. Intestinal permeability was studied by measurement of urinary excretion of Cr-EDTA after oral intake. RESULTS: Increased whole gut permeation before treatment (3.16%; interquartile range [IQR], 2.92-5.72) was restored to normal values (2.47%; IQR, 1.97-2.78) by anti-TNF treatment. Indomethacin increased whole gut permeability significantly more in patients with CD (before anti-TNF: 6.50%; IQR, 4.84-10.38; after anti-TNF: 5.50%; IQR, 3.97-10.09) compared with the healthy subjects (4.66%; IQR, 3.51-5.64). Eleven of 25 patients (44%) had an abnormal whole gut permeability response to indomethacin before anti-TNF, and 9 of them remained hyperresponsive after infusion, despite clinical remission. CONCLUSIONS: Although anti-TNF treatment suppresses inflammation and restores gut barrier function in patients with CD, it does not antagonize the barrier hyperresponsiveness to indomethacin. These data support the notion of an underlying intestinal mucosal barrier hyperresponsiveness in a subset of patients with CD, independent of inflammation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".