The Canadian state and the empowerment of the Francophone minority communities regarding their economic development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article deals with the collective efforts of the Francophone minority communities (FMCs), that is, Francophones outside the province of Quebec, to ensure their economic development. After a brief historical overview of the economic development forms taken by the FMCs, we will more closely analyze its current form, focusing on the partnership tendency between these FMCs and the state. The FMCs did not rely on the state before the 1970s for their development, since networks of Francophone associations took charge of their overall development. When the Official Languages Act came into effect in 1969, the situation changed in favor of an increasing development of a partnership between the government and the FMCs, assisted by funding. In this article, we present the form taken by this partnership in the economic sector, focusing on the first program set up by the Canadian state to specifically encourage the economic development of Francophone minorities: the Réseau de développement économique et d'employabilité (RDÉE). The RDÉE gave FMCs access to the first economic development government instrument aimed specifically at them. The RDÉE looks to adopt a partnership approach and encourage empowerment among FMCs. The analysis shows some of the partnership issues involved in the real implication of the empowerment by these communities for their own development, the sometimes difficult link between the governance structures and the FMCs' networks, as well as the legitimacy of the governance structures implemented within the RDÉE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".