MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973893430 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2007.05.066

Identification and characterization of RED120: A conserved PWI domain protein with links to splicing and 3′‐end formation

2007· article· en· W1973893430 on OpenAlexaff
Puri Fortes, Dáša Longman, Susan McCracken, Joanna Y. Ip, Raymond A. Poot, Iain W. Mattaj, Javier F. Cáceres, Benjamin J. Blencowe

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNA splicingPrecursor mRNABiologyProtein splicingsnRNPAlternative splicingCell biologyRNA-binding proteinSplicing factorRNA recognition motifMessenger RNAConserved sequenceGeneticsSpliceosomeCaenorhabditis elegansSR proteinGeneRNAPeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precursor (pre)-mRNA splicing can impact the efficiency of coupled steps in gene expression. SRm160 (SR-related nuclear matrix protein of 160 kDa), is a splicing coactivator that also functions as a 3'-end cleavage-stimulatory factor. Here, we have identified an evolutionary-conserved SRm160-interacting protein, referred to as hRED120 (for human Arg/Glu/Asp-rich protein of 120 kDa). hRED120 contains a conventional RNA recognition motif and, like SRm160, a PWI nucleic acid binding domain, suggesting that it has the potential to bridge different RNP complexes. Also, similar to SRm160, hRED120 associates with snRNP components, and remains associated with mRNA after splicing. Simultaneous suppression in Caenorhabditis elegans of the ortholog of hRED120 with the orthologs of splicing and 3'-end processing factors results in aberrant growth or developmental defects. These results suggest that RED120 may function to couple splicing with mRNA 3'-end formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207