MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973896939 · doi:10.1139/w02-028

Impact of pulsed Nd:YAG laser on the marine biofilm-forming bacteria <i>Pseudoalteromonas carrageenovora</i>: significance of physiological status

2002· article· en· W1973896939 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kanavillil Nandakumar, Tatsuya Shinozaki, Hideki Obika, Toshihiko Ooie, Akihiro Utsumi, Tetsuo Yano

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLaser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
KeywordsPseudoalteromonasBiofilmBacteriaMicrobiologyMarine bacteriophageBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of pulsed Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium/aluminium garnet) laser irradiation on the marine biofilm-forming bacteria Pseudoalteromonas carrageenovora during two growth stages (log phase and stationary phase) and under two stresses (reduced temperature and nutrient limitation) was investigated. Bacteria were exposed to a laser fluence of 0.1 J x cm(-2) for 5, 10, and 15 min with a peak power of 20 MW x cm(-2), a pulse width of 5 ns, and an average power of 1 W x cm(-2) with a repetition rate of 10 Hz. The mortality of bacteria immediately after the irradiation as well as after a set period of time was determined. Mortality was higher among log-phase bacteria (72%) than bacteria in the stationary phase (51%) and those grown under nutrient limitation (51%). Bacteria grown at reduced temperature had a mortality of 49%. However, the differences in cell density of log-phase, stationary-phase, nutrient-limited, and low-temperature irradiated samples compared with controls after 5 h of incubation were 96, 93, 94, and 86%, respectively. The mortality values suggest that the same laser fluence has different degrees of effectiveness, depending on the physiological state of the bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicLaser Applications in Dentistry and MedicineFrench-language works237,207