Assessment of gentamicin 7 mg/kg once daily for pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia: a pilot project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Use of once daily aminoglycosides continues to increase for the pediatric population, including oncology patients. Concerns have been identified and still need to be resolved including the optimal dose, frequency, and monitoring parameters. OBJECTIVE: We completed a study to determine if empiric use of gentamicin 7 mg/kg once daily in pediatric patients admitted with febrile neutropenia provided extrapolated peaks and drug-free intervals consistent with suggested preferred levels. DESIGN: A review of the patient's chart was completed following their discharge from the hospital between September 2006 and October 2007. SETTING: A community hospital. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 17 encounters for pediatric patients admitted for febrile neutropenia that received once daily gentamicin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Extrapolated peak levels and drug-free intervals. RESULTS: There were seven patients with a total of 17 encounters. The mean extrapolated peak level was 16.9 mg/L. The mean drug-free interval was 15.7 h. Both target peak and drug-free interval were obtained for two encounters (12%), which was one patient. CONCLUSION: Gentamicin 7 mg/kg/dose once daily does not provide preferred levels for all pediatric febrile neutropenic patients. Further investigation is required to ensure that once daily gentamicin regimens for pediatric oncology patients provide adequate clinical success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".