Independent Associations Between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Abdominal Obesity With Metabolic Risk in Adolescents and Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our objective was to examine the independent association between abdominal obesity (waist circumference (WC)) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) with metabolic syndrome (MetS) in 2,197 adults (ages 20-49 years) and 3,223 adolescents (ages 12-19 years). Individuals were stratified by CRF and WC using sex- and age-specific MetS criteria for adolescents and adults. Adolescents had a lower prevalence rate of MetS (5.4% vs. 12.8%) and high WC (15.5% vs. 35.7%), but a higher prevalence rate of low CRF (37.6% vs. 15.9%) than adults. As compared to adolescents and adults with low WC, those with a high WC (odds ratio (OR) = 5.5-16.5, P < 0.001) were more likely to have a clustering of MetS factors than those with low WC (OR = 1.2-3.8, P = 0.3 to <0.001), regardless of fitness level. Conversely, the beneficial effects of having moderate/high CRF on MetS were only observed in individuals with low WC, and not high WC. Thus, in conclusion, both high WC and low CRF are associated with increased odds of MetS in adolescents and adults. However, increased abdominal obesity is more strongly associated with MetS in adolescents and adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".