MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974023987 · doi:10.1071/rdv19n1ab215

215 COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL DIRECT TRANSFER FREEZING AND VITRIFICATION FOR THE CRYOPRESERVATION OF <i>IN VIVO</i> EMBRYOS FROM BRAHMAN CATTLE

2006· article· en· W1974023987 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. H. Pryor, C.R. Looney, D. J. Walker, G.E. Seidel, J.F. Hasler, D.C. Kraemer, S. Romo

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrahmanVitrificationCryopreservationAndrologyEmbryo transferReproductive technologyTheriogenologyBlastocystEmbryo cryopreservationBiologyEmbryoEmbryo cultureIn vivoHatchingBreedAnimal scienceEmbryogenesisMedicineBiotechnologyFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a need to develop an efficient cryopreservation technique for Brahman cattle embryos that would lead to improved success in the propagation of this breed. The objective of this study was to compare the post-thaw pregnancy rates in recipient cows after nonsurgical transfer of Brahman in vivo -derived embryos frozen in ethylene glycol (EG) and by a new vitrification (VT) method. Prior to the initial in vivo study, hatching rates were recorded 72 h post-thaw on 3 treatment groups (No treatment: 43/55, 78%; EG: 39/83, 47%; and VT: 33/103, 32%) of IVF embryos to determine if development could be achieved. This warranted Phase I: In vivo embryos were produced by multiple ovulation and nonsurgical embryo collections from Brahman cows 7 days post-estrus and AI. Embryos in morula/blastocyst stage of development were graded and maintained in holding medium (Vigro; Bioniche Animal Health, Inc., Belleville, Ontario, Canada) after collection, until randomly allocated for EG or VT protocols. Vitrification was performed using experimental media provided by a commercial company (V1: Vigro + 5 M EG; V2: Vigro + 7 M EG + 0.5 M Galactose + Ficoll; and Diluent: Vigro + 0.5 M Galactose) and by direct plunging into LN2 (Walker et al . 2005 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 17, 153). Freezing was performed at 0.5°C min-1 from -6°C to -32°C, using a commercially available medium (Vigro Freeze Plus; Bioniche). All embryos were packaged in sterile 0.25-mL plastic straws to allow for direct transfer (DT). Embryos were stored in LN2, and later thawed and nonsurgically transferred to synchronized recipient cows on Day 7 of their cycle. EG straws were air-thawed 5 s and then thawed in 30°C H2O for 10 s. VT straws were air-thawed 10 s and then thawed in 37°C H2O for 20 s prior to shaking them down to mix columns. Pregnancy results evaluated by ultrasound on Day 35 for the presence of a fetus from 4 replicates were 27% for EG (3/11) and 8% for VT (1/13) embryos. Problems with VT straws cracking during air thawing led to a second trial (Phase II) which changed the direct plunging technique for VT to a vapor freeze of 1 to 15 min prior to plunging into LN2. Pregnancy results from 16 transfers were 38% for EG (3/8) and 50% for VT (4/8) embryos, with no straws cracking. Although the number of observations is small, the results obtained showed that VT-DT is satisfactory for producing pregnancies comparable to EG-DT. Further research is required to confirm the results obtained in this preliminary study, and to test whether this method will allow the successful production of pregnancies under different environmental and field conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207