Bibliographic record
Abstract
Job strain, social support and marital factors have been related to cardiovascular outcome. To define marital and job factors in a sample of patients with mild hypertension where marital adjustment (by Dyadic Adjustment Scale,DAS) was related to 3 year left ventricular mass, a secondary analysis was performed on 103 men and women who underwent 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring, M-mode echocardiography and completed psychosocial questionnaires at baseline and 3 years (job variables by the Job Content Questionnaire; desire for marital change from the Areas of Change Questionnaire and marital support (MS) from DAS which was defined as the presence of both marital satisfaction and cohesion subscales (upper quartiles) at baseline). Marital support predicted 3 year left ventricular mass (p=.007) which decreased 8.0% in the MS group and increased 6.26% in the low MS group. The MS group also had lower 24hr diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure over 3 years (p=0.016 and 0.06). At followup the MS group trended to a lower albuminuria than the low MS group (MS 11.58+ 12.57;low MS 17.75+25.26 p=0.154 by t test; analysis of variance, p=0.340). MS had higher job demands than low MS (p=.008), desired less change from their partners and, at 3 years, had less unrecognized desire for marital change. Based on the amount of spousal contact during ABP, MS subjects spent much more time together after 3 years than at baseline (p=0.009) and compared to the low MS group (p=.027). While marital status remained stable, 50.8% of the sample experienced job changes; 26.3% had left their place of employment. Marital support, a construct of both the quality and quantity of contact between spouses, was related to improved 3 year outcome in mild hypertension. Job consistency is required to adequately examine the association between job factors and mild hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".