MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974086850 · doi:10.1071/rdv23n1ab321

321 OVARIAN SUPERSTIMULATION AND OOCYTE COLLECTION IN WOOD BISON, A THREATENED CANADIAN SPECIES

2010· article· en· W1974086850 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. M. Palomino, Robert McCorkell, Murray R. Woodbury, M. P. Cervantes, Behzad M. Toosi, Gregory P. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsTrusted Positioning (Canada)University of CalgaryUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBison bisonFollicular phaseBiologyEndangered speciesOvarian CortexAnimal scienceAndrologyMedicineOvaryEcologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) is a threatened species, and recovery is constrained by endemic tuberculosis and brucellosis in wild herds in and around Wood Buffalo National Park, Alberta, Canada. The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada has recommended the eradication of affected herds and repopulation with healthy bison obtained through the use of reproductive technologies. As part of the conservation effort, the specific objective of this study was to develop an effective ovarian superstimulatory protocol in bison that will permit collection of a large number of oocytes for the ultimate purpose of in vitro embryo production. Ovarian function was synchronized among female wood bison during the ovulatory season (December) by giving a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin followed 8 days later by transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular ablation. On the day after follicular ablation (expected day of follicular wave emergence, Day 0), bison were assigned randomly to 2 groups (n = 11/group) and given either a single intramuscular dose of 2500 IU of eCG or subcutaneous doses of 200 mg of FSH given on Days 0 and 2. A luteolytic dose of prostaglandin was given on Day 2, and 25 mg of LH was given intramuscularly on Day 4. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC) were collected 24 h after LH treatment by transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration using an 18 G × 2’ aspiration needle attached to a flexible tubing and a regulated vacuum pump (flow rate, 22 mL min–1). The COC were classified morphologically from 1 (excellent) to 4 (poor) based on attributes of the ooplasm and the number of surrounding cumulus cells. The number of COC in grade 1 to 3 was combined (i.e. grades acceptable for IVF) for purposes of statistical interpretation. Ovarian response and oocyte quality were compared between groups by t-tests, and COC collection rate was compared by chi-square analysis. The number (mean ± SEM) of follicles =5 mm was greater (P < 0.05) in bison treated with FSH than in those treated with eCG (12.2 ± 1.7 v. 5.8 ± 0.5), resulting in a greater number of follicles aspirated (11.2 ± 1.8 v. 5.6 ± 0.5; P < 0.05), more COC collected (7.2 ± 1.4 v. 3.4 ± 0.6; P < 0.05), and more COC of acceptable quality (6.1 ± 1.4 v. 2.5 ± 0.5). The COC collection rate (i.e. number of COC collected per number of follicles aspirated), however, did not differ between FSH- and eCG-treated groups [79/123 (64%) v. 37/62 (60%)]. The results document the successful collection of viable oocytes from superstimulated wood bison via tranvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration. The number of large follicles, follicles aspirated, and COC collected were more than twice as high in bison treated with FSH than in those treated with eCG. This work was supported by grants from Advancing Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food Fund and Agri-Food Innovation Fund. The authors thank Bioniche Animal Health Canada for providing Folltropin, Lutropin, and Pregnecol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207