MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The neuroanatomy of the human scrotum: surgical ramifications

2003· article· en· W1974185734 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Selçuk Yücel, Laurence S. Baskin

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Urology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScrotumAnatomyPenisNeuroanatomyGlans penisMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The developmental neuroanotomy of the human scrotum may not have been evaluated up to now, but the authors from San Francisco report here on an outstanding study in foetuses of this important area of interest. They have helped to define clearly the neuroanotomy of this region, which will be useful in planning surgery to the scrotum and penis in children. The group from the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto have evaluated the safety and efficacy of toleterodine in children who have previously failed to tolerate oxybutinin. They found that toleterodine is well tolerated in children, and 77% of patients were able to continue this treatment without significant side effects in this subgroup who could not tolerate oxybutinin. OBJECTIVE To define the scrotal nerve origin and distribution with respect to surrounding structures in male human fetuses, by using neuronal‐specific markers and three‐dimensional (3D) imaging techniques, as the developmental neuroanatomy of the human scrotum has not been studied in detail and an explicit description of nerve derivation and distribution in the human scrotum is germane to genital reconstructive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixteen normal human fetal penile specimens at 17.5–38 weeks of gestation were studied. Specimens were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin wax, serially sectioned at 6 µm and stained with the neuronal marker S‐100. All of the specimens contained the whole penis and scrotum from glans to anal verge. The gestational age of the fetuses was determined by fetal heel‐to‐toe length. 3D‐computer reconstruction of serial sections allowed a detailed analysis of the neuroanatomy of the fetal penis and scrotum. RESULTS The nerves innervating the ventral side of the proximal penis and scrotum originated mainly from the perineal nerves arising from pudendal nerves. The nerves travelling along the ventral side of penis coalesced at the penoscrotal area to be directed into the interscrotal septum. At the penoscrotal junction, nerves on both sides of the ventral penis shifted to the interscrotal septum in a triangular fashion. The interscrotal septum was densely occupied by nerve fibres. Nerves were distributed horizontally to both hemiscrotal walls through this interscrotal septum. Both hemiscrota seem primarily to be innervated separately. CONCLUSION The interscrotal septum has a dense innervation. Both hemiscrota were innervated mainly by horizontally distributed nerve fibres arising from the interscrotal septum. Any procedure violating the penoscrotal and interscrotal septal area may jeopardize scrotal innervation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of UrologySame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207