MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Uniform Approximations for Wireless Performance in Fading Channels

2013· article· en· W1974190285 on OpenAlexaff
Yamuna Dhungana, Chintha Tellambura

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoment-generating functionFadingRayleigh fadingMaximal-ratio combiningProbability density functionSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)MathematicsCumulative distribution functionChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive uniform approximations (UAs) for typical performance measures such as error probability, outage probability and capacity of wireless transmissions over flat fading channels impaired by noise. Uniform refers to the fact that these approximations are accurate over the whole range (low to high) of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values. First, the high-SNR results of Wang and Giannakis are generalized and unified for an arbitrary performance measure. Second, we develop a Mellin-transform-based procedure to construct low- and high-SNR asymptotics of error probability or outage. Specifically, these asymptotics are related to the left- and right-sided poles of a Mellin product with respect to its fundamental strip. Third, by using multiple low-SNR terms and a single high-SNR term, UAs for the error probability of coherent modulation are constructed for Rayleigh fading, maximal-ratio-combining (MRC), selection-combining (SC), dual hop relaying, and co-channel interference. UAs are also developed for the error probability of single- and multi-channel differential modulation, the product of two Q functions, and the miss probability of energy detection. By using a single low-SNR term and multiple high-SNR terms, the outage probability UA is also developed. Finally, since the capacity measure is not an exponentially decaying function, we derive a UA for an intermediate function which is based on the moment-generating function (MGF) and ultimately, the resulting approximation for the capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207