Influence of indomethacin on ventilatory and cerebrovascular responsiveness to CO<sub>2</sub>and breathing stability: the influence of P<scp>co</scp><sub>2</sub>gradients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indomethacin (INDO), a reversible cyclooxygenase inhibitor, is a useful tool for assessing the role of cerebrovascular reactivity on ventilatory control. Despite this, the effect of INDO on breathing stability during wakefulness has yet to be examined. Although the effect of reductions in cerebrovascular CO(2) reactivity on ventilatory CO(2) sensitivity is likely dependent upon the method used, no studies have compared the effect of INDO on steady-state and modified rebreathing estimates of ventilatory CO(2) sensitivity. The latter method includes the influence of PCO(2) gradients and cerebral perfusion, whereas the former does not. We examined the hypothesis that INDO-induced reduction in cerebrovascular CO(2) reactivity would 1) cause unstable breathing in conscious humans and 2) increase ventilatory CO(2) sensitivity during the steady-state method but not during rebreathing methods. We measured arterial blood gases, ventilation (VE), and middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) before and 90 min following INDO ingestion (100 mg) or placebo in 12 healthy participants. There were no changes in resting arterial blood gases or Ve following either intervention. INDO increased the magnitude of Ve variability (index of breathing stability) during spontaneous air breathing (+4.3 +/- 5.2 Deltal/min, P = 0.01) and reduced MCAv (-25 +/- 19%, P < 0.01) and MCAv-CO(2) reactivity during steady-state (-47 +/- 27%, P < 0.01) and rebreathing (-32 +/- 25%, P < 0.01). The Ve-CO(2) sensitivity during the steady-state method was increased with INDO (+0.5 +/- 0.5 l x min(-1) x mmHg(-1), P < 0.01), while no changes were observed during rebreathing (P > 0.05). These data indicate that the net effect of INDO on ventilatory control is an enhanced ventilatory loop gain resulting in increased breathing instability. Our findings also highlight important methodological and physiological considerations when assessing the effect of INDO on ventilatory CO(2) sensitivity, whereby the effect of INDO-induced reduction of cerebrovascular CO(2) reactivity on ventilatory CO(2) sensitivity is unmasked with the rebreathing method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".