Vegetation patterns around <i>Eriophorum vaginatum</i> L. tussocks in a cut-away peatland in southern Finland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the vegetation patterns around cottongrass tussocks with varying characteristics in a cut-away peatland 20 years after abandonment. When the effect of water table level variation was eliminated, the remaining variation in vegetation was related to (i) tussock characteristics and (ii) distance and orientation from a particular tussock. Logit regression showed a positive interaction between distance from the base of a tussock and a tussock's sheltering properties for all the studied plant species, indicating that the smaller the tussock the nearer plants have to be to find a favourable microsite. A southerly direction, which is the most exposed to solar irradiation, was the most inhospitable microsite. Our results indicated that cottongrass tussocks may offer a variety of microsites for colonizers with varying ecological requirements.Key words: cut-away peatland, colonization, Eriophorum vaginatum, facilitation, logit models, ordination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".