MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974308779 · doi:10.5430/jhm.v2n1p19

Bone marrow malignancies as paradigms of dysfunctional cell adhesion mechanisms

2012· article· en· W1974308779 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sérgio Dias

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematological Malignancies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAssociação Portuguesa Contra a Leucemia
KeywordsExtracellular matrixBone marrowTumor microenvironmentHaematopoiesisProgenitor cellStromal cellStem cellCell biologyCell adhesionBiologyCancer researchCell adhesion moleculeImmunologyCellGeneticsTumor cells

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In adult bone marrow (BM), hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) reside in micro - environments which provide instructions for self-renewal, survival, proliferation, differentiation and migration. Adequate response to such complex signals implies communication between HSCs, BM stroma and extracellular matrix molecules (ECM). This is achieved mainly through adhesion molecules. Malignant hematopoietic cells also interact with the BM microenvironment, which provides them with proliferative and survival advantages. Most of the studies on haematological diseases describe cell-ECM interactions as key mechanisms in tumor progression, while genetic alterations of HSC are considered major initiators of the malignant process. However, accumulating evidence suggests that an altered BM microenvironment provides anomalous cell adhesion signals, facilitating tumor initiation. Myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic syndromes are good examples of hematological disorders where alterations in BM microenvironment may play an important role in disease initiation. This review discusses the role for adhesion signals in regulating the BM microenvironment in normalcy and disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hematological MalignanciesSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207