Salvage Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common subtype of aggressive lymphoma, has considerable biologic and clinical heterogeneity. Despite recent therapeutic advances, up to 50% of patients relapse after standard chemoimmunotherapy. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) at relapse is of value in providing prognostic information on response to salvage chemotherapy and outcome after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (aHCT). Predictive biologic and gene expression markers, however, remain undefined, and require further clarification from additional molecular studies. To date, the standard of care in the management of relapsed/refractory DLBCL is salvage chemotherapy followed by an aHCT for those with chemotherapy-sensitive disease. Currently, there is no standard salvage chemotherapy regimen, and the use of immunotherapy for relapsed disease requires further evaluation. This review focuses on prognostic markers, current salvage therapies, and discusses the role of novel treatment in the management of relapsed/refractory DLBCL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".