MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974313628 · doi:10.1118/1.2244650

Po‐Thur Eve General‐23: 3He MRI Phenotypes of Lung in Phantoms and Healthy Volunteers

2006· article· en· W1974313628 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shayna McKay, David G. McCormack, Roya Etemad‐Rezai, Wilfred Lam, Alexei Ouriadov, Giles Santyr, Grace Párraga

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCOPDImaging phantomMedicineLungNuclear medicineVolunteerRadiologyPulmonary diseaseInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the most common chronic lung disease in North America and is the fourth leading cause of death in the US, Canada and Europe. We believe that the paucity of new mechanistic insights and disease treatments based on this information is due in part to the lack of non‐invasive, sensitive and specific tests for pulmonary structure and function. Our goal is to validate MRI‐derived biomarkers in phantoms and healthy volunteers laying the foundation for the study of lung disease progression in subject volunteers. Our overarching objective is to validate the use of MRI in the detection of early and novel phenotypes and biomarkers of respiratory disease including COPD. Here we report the first results of phantom and human studies with images acquired at 3Tesla. Ten healthy volunteers were scanned under protocol as well as a single pig lung phantom scanned twice within a single week. 3He MRI image‐derived measurements of ventilated volumes of the porcine phantom and subject volunteer images were made three times by a single observer. Using Image J, ventilated volumes were measured (excluding the airways) on the basis of manual outlining of contrast within lung each three times. Four different subject's images were reviewed providing a range of size and age of subjects. One subject was scanned twice on the same day (003) and one was scanned twice within a period of 2 weeks (008). Intra‐observer variability (ICC = 0.99) for all images was assessed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207