<i>N</i>-Methylmonothiocarbamatopentamminecobalt(III): Restricted C−N Bond Rotation and the Acid-Catalyzed O- to S-Bonded Rearrangement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-resolution (1)H and (13)C NMR studies on the linkage isomers [(NH(3))(5)CoOC(S)NHCH(3)](2+) and [(NH(3))(5)CoSC(O)NHCH(3)](2+) reveal that the O-bonded form exists as a 5:1 mixture of Z and E isomers arising from restricted rotation about the C-N bond. Similarly, restricted rotation is observed (at 20 degrees C) for the S-bonded isomer (Z/E ca. 18:1), but not for the isoelectronic carbamate ion [(NH(3))(5)CoOC(O)NHCH(3)](2+), nor for the unsubstituted carbamato complex [(NH(3))(5)CoOC(O)NH(2)](2+). An analysis of the variable-temperature NMR data for the O-bonded carbamato and urea complexes has provided quantitative data on the rotational barriers, and these ions involve much faster C-N bond rotations than the thiocarbamato complexes. The acid-catalyzed reaction of [(NH(3))(5)CoOC(S)NHCH(3)](2+) is confirmed, but there is much less parallel hydrolysis (ca. 2%) than previously reported (40 +/- 10%) for 0.1 M HClO(4). In 1 M HClO(4), [(NH(3))(5)CoSC(O)NHCH(3)](2+) and [(NH(3))(5)CoOH(2)](3+) are formed in parallel as an 83:17 mixture. The kinetic data suggest that the protonated form is at least 20-fold more reactive than the free ion and that the linkage isomerization and hydrolysis pathways are both acid-catalyzed, the latter clearly more so than the rearrangement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".