Effect of vitamin A deficiency on cardiovascular function in the rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selected parameters of cardiovascular function were evaluated in vitamin A-deficient rats at 70 days of age. Resting heart rate was increased by an average of 100 bpm (21.4+/-2.7%), whereas resting systolic blood pressure was normal in vitamin A-deficient animals. The maximal contractile force developed per milligram weight of tissue by aortic rings excised from vitamin A-deficient animals was reduced in response to high potassium (-25.0+/-8.7%) and phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (-36.8+/-8.4%) but was only slightly reduced in response to norepinephrine (-17.8+/-11.1%). Intimal rubbing to remove the endothelium had no effect on the loss in contractile responsiveness, and the relaxant response to acetylcholine was similar between control and vitamin A-deficient tissue groups. This suggests that the decrease in contractility of vascular smooth muscle from the vitamin A-deficient rats did not involve altered release of endothelium-derived vasoactive factors. Western blot analysis suggested a reduction in the protein levels of several differentiation markers including alpha-actin (-22%), calponin (-37%), desmin (-37%), and vinculin (-40%), whereas the level of PKCalpha was unchanged from control values. Our findings indicate a significant decrease in contractile responsiveness of aortic smooth muscle of the vitamin A-deficient rat that may be associated with a down regulation in the expression of contractile-related proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".