Notch Signaling Is Required to Maintain All Neural Stem Cell Populations – Irrespective of Spatial or Temporal Niche
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, Notch signaling has been reported to underscore the ability of neural stem cells (NSCs) to self-renew. Utilizing mice deficient in presenilin-1(PS1), we asked whether the function of Notch signaling in NSC maintenance was conserved. At embryonic day 14.5, all NSCs--both similar (cortex-, ganglionic eminence- and hindbrain-derived) and distinct (retinal stem cell)--require Notch signaling in a gene-dosage-sensitive manner to undergo expansionary symmetric divisions, as assessed by the clonal, in vitro neurosphere assay. Within the adult, however, Notch signaling modulates cell cycle time in order to ensure brain-derived NSCs retain their self-renewal property. At face value, the effects in the embryo and adult appear different. We propose potential hypotheses, including the ability of cell cycle to modify the mode of division, in order to resolve this discrepancy. Regardless, these findings demonstrate that PS1, and presumably Notch signaling, is required to maintain all NSCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it