The Use of E/A Ratio as a Predictor of Outcome in Cirrhotic Patients Treated With Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The clinical significance of diastolic dysfunction in cirrhosis, a feature of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of E/A ratio, an indicator of diastolic dysfunction, to predict ascites clearance and mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) insertion. METHODS: A total of 101 cirrhotic patients who received TIPS had pre-TIPS assessments of demographics, severity of liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores), renal function, hemodynamics, and cardiac function (two-dimensional echocardiography). An E/A ratio of < or =1 was used to indicate diastolic dysfunction. Patients were followed-up for a mean period of 24.6+/-2.4 months post TIPS. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients with an E/A ratio of < or =1 (group A), and 60 patients with an E/A ratio of >1 (group B) were studied. Group A had significantly higher MELD scores (14.0+/-1.0 vs. 11.4+/-0.8; P=0.03), because of higher serum creatinine levels (107+/-5 vs. 86+/-6 micromol/l; P<0.01). There was no difference in pre-TIPS systemic hemodynamics, systolic function, or portal pressure between the two groups. After TIPS, more patients in group B had ascites clearance (log rank, P=0.038), and the same patients had a higher probability of survival (log rank, P=0.046). There were three post-TIPS cardiac deaths in group A only. A multivariate analysis showed that an E/A of ratio < or =1 was predictive of slow ascites clearance (hazard ratio=7.3, 95% confidence interval=1.3-40.7, P=0.021) and death after TIPS (hazard ratio=4.7, 95% confidence interval=1.1-20.2, P=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Diastolic dysfunction, indicated by reduced E/A ratio, is prevalent in advanced cirrhosis and is associated with reduced ascites clearance and increased mortality post TIPS, possibly related to worsening of hemodynamic dysfunction in the post-TIPS period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".