Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Complicating Cranial Vault Reconstruction for Sagittal Synostosis in a Child
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors report a case of postoperative visual loss in a pediatric patient who underwent an uneventful cranial vault reconstruction. A 5-year-old boy underwent total cranial vault reconstruction for nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. He was positioned prone for 6 hours and then supine for the final 2 hours of surgery. Controlled hypotension was used to maintain the systolic arterial pressure at 80 mmHg to 90 mmHg. The intraoperative hematocrit was 23% to 31%. In the immediate postoperative period, both pupils were noted to be reactive to light. After an uneventful night in the intensive care unit, he was transferred to the ward. The eyelids were edematous on postoperative day 1, and visual examination was no longer possible. He was discharged home on postoperative day 4, and readmitted 2 days later with bilateral blindness. The pupils were nonreactive, and the optic discs were pale and edematous. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the head revealed no abnormality. Intravenous steroid therapy was initiated, and the patient was taken to the operating room for re-exploration; the intracranial pressure was found to be normal. The presumed diagnosis was bilateral infarctions of the anterior optic nerves. Visual acuity 14 months after surgery was less than 3/200 in the right eye and 20/20-2 in the left, indicating significant recovery. Pediatric patients undergoing cranial vault reconstruction are at risk for postoperative visual loss because of ischemic optic nerve injury. Prolonged duration in the prone position and significant blood loss may be risk factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".