Immunocamouflage: Prevention of transfusion‐induced graft‐versus‐host disease via polymer grafting of donor cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) can occur following the transfer of allogeneic lymphocytes into immunosuppressed and, in rare cases, immunocompetent recipients. The initiation of GVHD requires the allorecognition of the recipient's disparate MHC molecules by the donor T lymphocytes (T cell). Currently, GVHD is controlled by cyclosporine administration--a potent, but toxic, T-cell suppressing agent. To determine if the nontoxic grafting of methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG) to immunologically foreign lymphocytes could prevent allorecognition and GVHD, in vitro and in vivo murine studies were performed. In vitro studies utilizing mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLRs) demonstrate that mPEG modification effectively prevented allorecognition and subsequent T-cell proliferation. The loss of cellular proliferation was not due to mPEG cytotoxicity but rather to the inhibition of cell-cell interactions. Flow cytometric studies showed that T-cell and antigen-presenting cell adhesion molecules (CD2, CD11a), signaling (CD3epsilon, T-cell receptor), and costimulatory molecules (CD28, CD80) were efficiently immunocamouflaged by mPEG derivatization. Interestingly, upon antigenic stimulation mPEG-modified cells demonstrate enhanced apoptosis as evidenced by DNA laddering. In vivo studies using immunocompetent and immunosuppressed mice established that mPEG modification of donor lymphocytes effectively attenuated the in vivo proliferation of donor cells and the initiation of GVHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".