Efficient and Expedient Two-Step Pyranose-Retaining Fluorescein Conjugation of Complex Reducing Oligosaccharides: Galectin Oligosaccharide Specificity Studies in a Fluorescence Polarization Assay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluorescence labeling of naturally occurring saccharides provides a tool for studying lectins. A practical and efficient two-step protocol for fluorescence labeling of reducing sugars without disrupting their pyranose structure has been developed, consisting of generation of the amino sugar using NH(4)HCO(3)(s)/NH(3)(aq, concentrated) followed by BOP-mediated acylation with derivatives of 5- or 6-carboxyfluorescein. The acylated conjugates were subsequently run against galectins-1, -3, and -8, beta-galactoside recognizing lectins of current interest, in a fluorescence polarization binding assay. Upon analyzing a collection of isomerically pure 5- and 6-carboxyfluorescein derivatives with different tether lengths, we found that conjugates based on 5-carboxyfluorescein gave significantly better results than the ones based on 6-carboxyfluorescein and that galectins-1 and -8 favored conjugates with different tether lengths than did galectin-3. The results show that fluorescence labeling can be chemically tuned to find optimal probes for individual galectins but also probes interacting well with many galectins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".