MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974525329 · doi:10.1139/v10-161

Comparison of photoenolization and alcohol release from alkyl-substituted benzoyl benzoic esters

2011· article· en· W1974525329 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sivaramakrishnan Muthukrishnan, Tamara C. S. Pace, Qian Li, B. Seok, Gerdien de Jong, Cornelia Bohne, Anna D. Guđmundsdóttir

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadical Photochemical Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySubstituentFlash photolysisAlkylPhotochemistryIntersystem crossingIsopropylMedicinal chemistryReactivity (psychology)PhotodissociationOrganic chemistryReaction rate constantSinglet stateExcited state

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photolysis of 1B in argon-saturated solutions yields 4B and releases methanol. Laser flash photolysis of 1B shows formation of biradical 2B, which has a lifetime of ~50 ns and a λ max at 330 nm. Biradical 2B undergoes an intersystem crossing to form photoenols E-3B and Z-3B with a λ max at 390 nm. Laser flash photolysis shows that the lifetimes of E-3B and Z-3B are affected by the solvent. Density functional theory calculations demonstrate that the transition-state barrier for a 1,5-H atom shift from Z-3B to regenerate 1B is affected by the ortho-alkyl substituents, whereas the stereoelectronics of the alkyl substituent affect the transition-state barrier of E-3B as it undergoes electrocyclic ring closure to form 4B. The photoreactivity of 1B was compared with its analogous methyl and isopropyl derivatives 1A and 1C, respectively, to better estimate the effect of the alkyl substituent on reactivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicRadical Photochemical ReactionsFrench-language works237,207