MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974531346 · doi:10.1177/0094582x06288058

Haiti Election 2006

2006· article· en· W1974531346 on OpenAlex
Alex Dupuy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLatin American Perspectives · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVictoryPresidencyPolitical scienceInterimDemocracyPresidential systemMandateEconomic historyPower (physics)Presidential electionPublic administrationPoliticsLawHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On February 7, 2006, Haitians went to the polls and, despite many tech nical and other logistical difficulties, reelected Ren? Preval president. Preval was first elected in 1996 and transferred power to Jean-Bertrand Aristide in February 2001 after the latter had won reelection in November 2000. ' Aristide was overthrown by former members of the defunct Haitian Army in February 2004, cutting short his second five-year mandate. He was replaced by an interim government led by G?rard Latortue as prime minis ter and Boniface Alexandre as president in March 2004 with the full back ing of the United States, Canada, and France. Originally scheduled for November 2005, the presidential election was postponed four times before being finally held on February 7, 2006. Pr?val's reelection represents a major victory for what could be called the popular sector and a major defeat for those Haitian eliteand foreign backed forces that coalesced in the Democratic Convergence and the Group of 184 to oppose and, with the help of the former army rebels, ultimately over throw Aristide. These forces had hoped that with Aristide gone one of their own could win the presidency. Out of a field of 33 candidates for the presi dency, the 8 candidates from the coalitions and the 2 from the former army rebel forces that toppled Aristide received a combined 32.4 percent of the approximately 2.2 million votes cast. Pr?val received 51.21 percent, thus clinching his victory in the first round. Voter turnout was estimated at around 63 percent (Haiti/Conseil Electoral Provisoire, 2006).2 The election also represented a defeat for the interim government. Its main objective was to pacify the country and prepare for new presidential and parliamentary elections, and this basically meant cracking down on Aristide supporters, especially but not exclusively the armed gangs known as chimes in the L?valas strongholds in the ghettos of Port-au-Prince, and preparing for new elections that might bring to power a government that would respect the rules of the political game dictated by the major capitalist

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it