Bibliographic record
Abstract
On February 7, 2006, Haitians went to the polls and, despite many tech nical and other logistical difficulties, reelected Ren? Preval president. Preval was first elected in 1996 and transferred power to Jean-Bertrand Aristide in February 2001 after the latter had won reelection in November 2000. ' Aristide was overthrown by former members of the defunct Haitian Army in February 2004, cutting short his second five-year mandate. He was replaced by an interim government led by G?rard Latortue as prime minis ter and Boniface Alexandre as president in March 2004 with the full back ing of the United States, Canada, and France. Originally scheduled for November 2005, the presidential election was postponed four times before being finally held on February 7, 2006. Pr?val's reelection represents a major victory for what could be called the popular sector and a major defeat for those Haitian eliteand foreign backed forces that coalesced in the Democratic Convergence and the Group of 184 to oppose and, with the help of the former army rebels, ultimately over throw Aristide. These forces had hoped that with Aristide gone one of their own could win the presidency. Out of a field of 33 candidates for the presi dency, the 8 candidates from the coalitions and the 2 from the former army rebel forces that toppled Aristide received a combined 32.4 percent of the approximately 2.2 million votes cast. Pr?val received 51.21 percent, thus clinching his victory in the first round. Voter turnout was estimated at around 63 percent (Haiti/Conseil Electoral Provisoire, 2006).2 The election also represented a defeat for the interim government. Its main objective was to pacify the country and prepare for new presidential and parliamentary elections, and this basically meant cracking down on Aristide supporters, especially but not exclusively the armed gangs known as chimes in the L?valas strongholds in the ghettos of Port-au-Prince, and preparing for new elections that might bring to power a government that would respect the rules of the political game dictated by the major capitalist
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.174 | 0.098 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".