MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974575692 · doi:10.1094/pdis-93-12-1351b

First Report of <i>Pyrenophora seminiperda</i> in Turkey and Greece

2009· article· en· W1974575692 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas E. Stewart, Phil S. Allen, Susan E. Meyer

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyConidiumMicrofungiMyceliumBotanyPerennial plant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pyrenophora seminiperda (Brittleb. & D.B. Adam) Shoemaker (anamorph Drechslera campanulata (Lév.) B. Sutton) is a generalist seed pathogen that can cause high mortality in the seed banks of annual and perennial grasses and a minor leaf spot disease. Its current reported distribution is mainly temperate grasslands, deserts, and winter cereal-growing regions in Argentina, Australia, Canada, Egypt, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States (2). P. seminiperda was originally described in France in the mid-1800s, but there are no recent reports from eastern Europe or Asia (2). In May of 2008, we observed what appeared to be P. seminiperda on seeds from seed bank samples collected in Turkey. Evidence of disease was observed as macroscopic black stromata protruding from the seed. The characteristic club-shaped stromata were collected from a Taeniatherum caput-medusae seed near Pamukkale, Turkey and six Bromus tectorum seeds in Love Valley near Goreme, Turkey. An additional collection from a single undispersed B. tectorum seed was obtained from Perissa, Greece. Identity of the pathogen was tentatively established by evaluating morphological characteristics for nine isolates in V8 agar culture. After 4 days of incubation at 20°C with a 12-h photoperiod, the cultures produced white mycelium. Following wounding, the mycelium produced black, club-shaped stromata (2 to 8 × 0.4 to 0.9 mm) in a radial pattern. These produced branched conidiophores bearing crescent-shaped, multicellular conidia (79 to 125 μm long). These attributes are consistent with those of the anamorph of P. seminiperda as described by Shoemaker (4) and Campbell et al. (1). The teleomorph was not observed. The identity of the isolates as P. seminiperda was confirmed with ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) genetic sequencing analysis. ITS sequences obtained were identical to sequences for North American haplotypes of this species. Four of the Love Valley isolates, (representative isolate: GQ168725, BPI 879142, NRRL 54032) matched the HTA haplotype (GQ168724), while the other four (representative isolate: GQ168736, BPI 879143, NRRL 54033) matched the HTJ haplotype (GQ168735). The isolate from Perissa, Greece (GQ168728, BPI 879144, NRRL 54034) matched the HTC haplotype (GQ168727). Pathogenicity of several Love Valley isolates was confirmed by producing conidia in culture, dusting nondormant B. tectorum seeds with 0.003 g of conidial inoculum per 50 seeds, and incubating for 14 days at 10/20°C with a 12-h photoperiod. Stromata developed on >90% of inoculated seeds and mortality as high as 34% was observed. Morphological similarities combined with ITS sequence data provide conclusive evidence that P. seminiperda occurs in Turkey and Greece. The discovery of this pathogen in these countries indicates that it may be widespread in Eurasia and that it could have arrived in North America on seeds of B. tectorum (3) rather than representing a novel pathogen for this important weed in its North American range. References: (1) M. A. Campbell et al. Plant Pathol. 52:448, 2003. (2) R. W. Medd et al. Australas. Plant Pathol. 32:539, 2003. (3) S. E. Meyer et al. Can J. Plant Pathol. 30:525, 2008. (4) R. A. Shoemaker. Can. J. Bot. 44:1451, 1966.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207