MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974585411 · doi:10.1117/12.567421

Polarization-sensitive OCT system using single-mode fiber

2004· article· en· W1974585411 on OpenAlexaff
Radu G. Cucu, Justin Pedro, Richard B. Rosen, Adrian Podoleanu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsNanoacademic Technologies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsOptical coherence tomographySuperluminescent diodeMueller calculusMaterials scienceBirefringencePolarization (electrochemistry)Astronomical interferometerOptical fiberInterferometryOptoelectronicsPhysicsPolarimetryScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) takes into account the vector nature of light waves (state of polarization). The most complete information about the polarization properties of a biological target is given by the depth resolved Mueller matrix elements, however, it is difficult to construct such a system for in-vivo examination. We designed and assembled a simpler system, with two incoherent channels to provide limited information, but essential on the polarization properties of the tissue. The interferometer is a hybrid configuration of bulk optic and single mode optical fiber components. No polarization maintaining fiber is used. The reference and sample beams interfere in single mode optical couplers. The low coherence light source is a superluminescent diode of 850 nm center wavelength and 25 nm spectrum FWHM (which corresponds to a depth resolution of 12 microns in tissue). The system can display either a pair of two polarisation sensitive OCT images, corresponding to linear orthogonal polarisation directions or a pair of images, a polarisation insensitive (pure reflectivity) image and a birefringence retardation map. The 12 bit grayscale images are collected by fast en-face scanning (T-scan) at 2 frames/s. We demonstrate in vivo en face images of the retinal nerve fiber layer, lamina cribrosa, cornea and teeth. A rotation angle of 0.3 degrees per micron was evaluated from the retinal nerve fiber layer and lamina cribrosa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207