Production of Fructose and Ethanol from Cane Molasses Using <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> ATCC 36858
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this research was to study the possibility of the production of ethanol and enriched fructose syrups from sugar cane molasses using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 36858. In batch experiments with a total sugar concentration of between 96.7 g/l and 323.5 g/l, the fructose yield was above 90% of the theoretical value. The ethanol yield and volumetric productivity were in the range of 66% and 77% of the theoretical value, and between 0.53 g ethanol/l × h and 3.15 g ethanol/l × h, respectively. The fructose fraction in the carbohydrates content of the produced syrups was more than 95% when the total initial sugar concentration in the medium was below 273.8 g/l. Some oligosaccharides and glycerol were also produced in all tested media. The maximum amount of produced oligosaccharides including raffinose accounted for 13.4 g/l in the cane molasses medium with 323.5 g/l sugars in the initial phase of the fermentation process. The oligosaccharides produced and raffinose were completely consumed by the end of the fermentation process when the total initial sugar concentration was less than 191.3 g/l. The glycerol concentration was below 9.9 g/l. These findings are useful in the production of ethanol and high fructose syrups using sugar cane molasses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".