Residual toxicity of two insecticides on three field populations of <i>Lygus lineolaris</i> (Hemiptera: Miridae) collected along the St Lawrence valley in eastern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insecticides are still the single main pest control method employed today by most growers to mitigate damage done by the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois) (Hemiptera: Miridae). In eastern Canada, the complex agricultural ecosystem, which may be described as a mosaic of farmlands dispersed among natural habitats (forest, prairies), allows tarnished plant bug adults to fly and move from sprayed to non-sprayed areas. In 2004 (late August to early September), three populations of L. lineolaris were collected from three mixed vegetation strips adjacent to orchards and vineyards along the St Lawrence valley: the Niagara Peninsula (Ontario), Dunham (Quebec) and La Pocatière (Quebec). Assays were done in the laboratory by confining adults in glass vials coated with dried residues. The estimated LC(50) values for the three populations varied from 11.2 to 16.8 x 10(-5) g L(-1) for azinphos-methyl and from 0.8 to 1.4 x 10(-5) g L(-1) for cypermethrin. In contrast to the Mississippi delta, no tolerance to insecticides was found in the populations collected. Possible explanations for this non-tolerance to insecticides includes a very low selection pressure as a result of the reduced number of insecticide treatments done in the context of the diversified agricultural landscapes encountered in eastern Canada which allow movements of adults from treated to non-treated areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".