MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974691617 · doi:10.4141/cjss06036

Nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide and methane emissions from irrigated cropping systems as influenced by legumes, manure and fertilizer

2008· article· en· W1974691617 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
B. H. Ellert, H. H. Janzen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgronomyEnvironmental scienceNitrous oxideFertilizerManureCarbon dioxideLegumeCropping systemMethaneNitrogenManure managementGreenhouse gasCropChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Irrigated land in southern Alberta is intensively managed, producing high yields but also requiring higher inputs, notably of nitrogen (N), than adjacent rainfed lands. The higher N inputs, combined with enhanced soil moisture, might stimulate nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions, but the influence of management on these emissions has not been widely studied. Our objective was to assess soil N 2 O emissions, along with those of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and of methane (CH 4 ), from irrigated cropping systems as influenced by source of N. We used a chamber technique to measure year-round emissions for 3 yr in long-term irrigated crop rotations receiving N as legume crop residues, non-legume crop residues, livestock manure or ammonium nitrate fertilizer. Unlike CO 2 fluxes, which peaked during the growing season, those of N 2 O showed no consistent seasonal trends; emissions occurred sporadically in bursts throughout the year. Depending on management practices, 0.4 to 4.0 kg N 2 O-N ha -1 yr -1 was emitted to the atmosphere. The amount of N 2 O emitted from the alfalfa system, averaged over all manure and fertilizer N amendments, was more than twofold that emitted from the corn system. The proportions of fertilizer-N released as N 2 O were 0.95% for the alfalfa system and 1.30% for the corn system. After livestock manure or legume residues were incorporated, soil CO 2 and N 2 O emissions appeared to be intertwined, but during the early spring N 2 O emissions were decoupled from CO 2 . Furthermore, N 2 O emissions were highly variable in space; at three of 54 chambers, N 2 O fluxes were consistently 12 to 55 times greater than those for other chambers in the same treatment. Such complexity conceals the underlying processes of net N 2 O production and transport to the soil surface. Key words: Greenhouse gas, fluxes, carbon dioxide, methane, flux chamber, alfalfa, silage corn, fababean, manure, fertilizer, N inputs, N 2 O leakage, legumes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207