MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974734962 · doi:10.1063/1.2356475

Size effects in the infrared spectra of NH3 ice nanoparticles studied by a combined molecular dynamics and vibrational exciton approach

2006· article· en· W1974734962 on OpenAlexaff
George Firanescu, David Luckhaus, Ruth Signorell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFull width at half maximumExcitonExtinction (optical mineralogy)InfraredParticle (ecology)Spectral lineMolecular dynamicsMolecular physicsAmorphous solidInfrared spectroscopyMaterials scienceAtomic physicsChemistryPhysicsOpticsCrystallographyComputational chemistryMineralogyCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrared extinction spectra of ammonia ice nanoparticles with radii between 2 and 10 nm show pronounced band shape variations depending on the conditions of particle formation by collisional cooling. We present experimental and theoretical evidence showing that the variations in the region of the nu2 (umbrella) fundamental are due to changes in the particle size. The effect is analyzed in terms of an explicit atomistic model of the particles' structure and vibrational dynamics. An explicit potential function combined with a novel extension of the vibrational exciton approach allows us to simulate extinction spectra for particles containing up to 16,000 atoms. It is shown that the particles formed under the conditions of our experiments consist of a crystalline core surrounded by an amorphous shell with an approximately constant thickness of 1-2 nm. For the nu2 fundamental, this shell gives rise to a broad band [full width at half maximum (FWHM) 72 cm(-1)] blueshifted by about 19 cm(-1) relative to a narrow peak (FWHM of 19 cm(-1)) which arises from the crystalline core.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207