Doppel-induced cerebellar degeneration in transgenic mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Doppel (Dpl) is a paralog of the mammalian prion protein (PrP); it is abundant in testes but expressed at low levels in the adult central nervous system. In two Prnp-deficient (Prnp(0/0)) mouse lines (Ngsk and Rcm0), Dpl overexpression correlated with ataxia and death of cerebellar neurons. To determine whether Dpl overexpression, rather than the dysregulation of genes neighboring the Prn gene complex, was responsible for the ataxic syndrome, we placed the mouse Dpl coding sequence under the control of the Prnp promoter and produced transgenic (Tg) mice on the Prnp(0/0)-ZrchI background (hereafter referred to as ZrchI). ZrchI mice exhibit neither Dpl overexpression nor cerebellar degeneration. In contrast, Tg(Dpl)ZrchI mice showed cerebellar granule and Purkinje cell loss; the age of onset of ataxia was inversely proportional to the levels of Dpl protein. Crosses of Tg mice overexpressing wild-type PrP with two lines of Tg(Dpl)ZrchI mice resulted in a phenotypic rescue of the ataxic syndrome, while Dpl overexpression was unchanged. Restoration of PrP expression also rendered the Tg(Dpl) mice susceptible to prion infection, with incubation times indistinguishable from non-Tg controls. Whereas the rescue of Dpl-induced neurotoxicity by coexpression of PrP argues for an interaction between the PrP and Dpl proteins in vivo, the unaltered incubation times in Tg mice overexpressing Dpl in the central nervous system suggest that Dpl is unlikely to be involved in prion formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".