Fetal Vascular Obstructive Lesions: Nosology and Reproducibility of Placental Reaction Patterns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assemble and test the reliability of a complete set of the placental reaction patterns seen with chronic fetal vascular obstruction in the hope that this might provide a standardized diagnostic framework useful for practicing pathologists. Study cases (14 with fetal vascular obstructive lesions, 6 controls) were reviewed blindly by seven pathologists after agreement on a standard set of diagnostic criteria. Majority vote served as the gold standard and 80% of the 180 diagnoses rendered (9 diagnoses each for 20 cases) were agreed upon by at least six of the seven scores. The sensitivity of individual diagnosis relative to the group consensus averaged 83% (range, 69-100%) and specificity averaged 91% (range, 86-100%). Reproducibility was measured by unweighted kappa-values and interpreted as follows: < 0.2, poor; 0.2-0.6, fair/moderate; > 0.6, substantial. Kappa values for lesions of distal villi were generally superior to those for lesions involving large fetal vessels: avascular villi (0.49), villous stromal-vascular karyorrhexis (0.58), and villitis of unknown etiology (VUE) with stem villitis and avascular villi (0.65) versus large vessel thrombi (any vessel, 0.34; chorionic plate vessel, 0.40) and intimal fibrin cushions (recent, 0.47; remote, 0.78). Reproducibility for a global impression of any villous change consistent with chronic fetal vascular obstruction was substantial (0.63), while that for a more severe subgroup was moderate (0.44). Three points are worthy of emphasis. Our system separately recognizes, but later combines, uniformly avascular villi and villous stromal-vascular karyorrhexis as manifestations of the same underlying process. We propose that this combined group of villous lesions be dichotomized with the terms fetal thrombotic vasculopathy or extensive avascular villi (and/or villous stromal-vascular karyorrhexis) being reserved for the group with 15 or more affected terminal villi per section. Scattered foci of avascular villi (and/or villous stromal-vascular karyorrhexis) could be used to describe less severe cases. Finally, we distinguish VUE with stem villitis and avascular villi (obliterative fetal vasculopathy) as a distinct process with substantial perinatal morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.063 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".