Relative Potential for Selection of Quinolone-Resistance- Determining-Region Mutations in<i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>by Gemifloxacin, Gatifloxacin and Moxifloxacin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Serial passage of a clinical isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae, in the presence of moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin or gemifloxacin, gave rise to resistant isolates. Non-susceptibility as defined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, formerly NCCLS) breakpoints arose on Days 10, 11, and 12 with gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin respectively. Moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin selected for a single step quinolone-resistant-determining-region (QRDR) mutation in DNA gyrase (GyrA) on Day 4 and 7 respectively, whereas gemifloxacin selected simultaneously for multi-step mutations in gyrase and topoisomerase IV (ParC) on Day 17 and activated a non-reserpine inhibited efflux mechanism by Day 4. As found in clinical isolates, mutations included Ser-81-Phe and Glu-85-Lys in GyrA and Ser-79-Phe or Asp-83-Tyr in ParC. At high MICs, moxifloxacin showed a previously unreported 4 amino-acid deletion in GyrB as well as a more unusual substitution Ser-79-Leu/Ile in ParC. Gemifloxacin showed a 2- to 16-fold greater activity than moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin against strains with two or more QRDR mutations, however, its potency did not translate to nonsusceptibility and gemifloxacin MIC values were either at or well above the CLSI nonsusceptible breakpoint concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".