HCO<sub>3</sub> increment in arterial line can reveal significant vascular access recirculation in high‐flux hemodialysis: A preliminary report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a new and simple way that can reveal the presence of vascular access recirculation (VAR) in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Acid-base and blood gas parameters (pH, pO(2), pCO(2), and HCO(3)) were measured in blood samples drawn from an arterial fistula needle before the initiation of HD and from arterial and venous lines simultaneously 5 min later, in 31 patients (group A). Vascular access recirculation was measured using the glucose infusion test (GIT) immediately after the withdrawal of the 5-min samples. The same study was repeated in 30 patients in whom HD lines were reversed (group B). A comparison with baseline (predialysis) values of an analysis of the arterial line in group A at 5 min revealed that pCO(2) increased by 1.14+/-2.5 mmHg and HCO(3) by 0.6+/-0.6 mM/L (p<0.02 and p<0.00001, respectively). The corresponding pO(2) and pH values did not show significant differences. Glucose infusion test at 5 min (GITa) was -0.058+/-0.03%. A comparison with baseline (predialysis) values of an analysis of the arterial line in group B at 5 min revealed that pCO(2) increased by 7.7+/-3.5 mmHg and HCO(3) by 2.9+/-1.0 mM/L (p<0.000001 in each case). The pH level was significantly lower in comparison with baseline values (p<0.00001), while pO(2) did not show a significant difference. Glucose infusion test at 5 min (GITb) was 12.0+/-6.1% (p<0.000001 in comparison with GITa values). Clinically significant VAR was defined as HCO(3) increment >1.8 mM/L, based on the receiver-operating characteristics curve, which showed a threshold value of HCO(3) increment >1.8 mmol/L as a predictor of GIT recirculation. Five minutes after the initiation of high-flux HD with a 0 ultrafiltration rate, there is a small increment in arterial HCO(3) values relative to predialysis values. Clinically significant VAR is present when this increment is higher than 1.8 mM/L.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".