MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974864623 · doi:10.1142/s0218301307004886

MASSLESS SCALAR FIELD PROPAGATOR IN A QUANTIZED SPACETIME

2007· article· en· W1974864623 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics E · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinkowski spacePropagatorScalar fieldMassless particleSpacetimeScalar (mathematics)Euclidean geometryDiscretization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider in detail the analytic behaviour of the non-interacting massless scalar field two-point function in H. S. Snyder's discretized non-commuting spacetime. The propagator we find is purely real on the Euclidean side of the complex p2 plane and goes like 1/p2 as p2→0 from either the Euclidean or Minkowski side. The real part of the propagator goes smoothly to zero as p2 increases to the discretization scale 1/a2and remains zero for p2>1/a2. This behaviour is consistent with the termination of single-particle propagation on the ultraviolet side of the discretization scale. The imaginary part of the propagator, consistent with a multiparticle-state spectral function branch discontinuity, is finite and continuous on the Minkowski side, slowly falling to zero when 1/a2 2<∞. The multi-particle aspect of this spectral function within the Källen-Lehmann representation of the propagator leads to the interpretation that the propagation of free-fields in a quantized spacetime is analogous to propagation of interacting fields in a continuous spacetime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ESame topicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesFrench-language works237,207