CASE REPORTS: Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma of Bone Arising in Chronic Osteomyelitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This case report shows the importance of frozen section and/or permanent section pathology for diagnosis of tumorous conditions in patients with chronic osteomyelitis. According to published reports, a coincidence of malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone and post-fracture osteomyelitis has occurred in only four patients. Our report details the treatment of 51-year-old man with a fracture 15 years previously and subsequent chronic osteomyelitis of the left distal femur. The original treatment was open reduction and casting. Fifteen years after the injury, the patient presented to the emergency room with increasing pain, erythema, swelling, and increased purulent discharge from the distal femur. Irrigation and debridement was done, but no frozen section or permanent pathology specimens were obtained. The left distal femur was radically resected for treatment of osteomyelitis. Histologic samples of the specimen revealed malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone. A metastatic workup was negative. Subsequently, the left hip was disarticulated for wide resection of the tumor. One of two inguinal lymph nodes removed at that time was positive for malignant fibrous histiocytoma. The patient had additional chemotherapy. He was still alive 27 months after the operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".