MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974917344 · doi:10.1002/cncr.23208

Multimarker phenotype predicts adverse survival in patients with lymph node‐negative colorectal cancer

2007· article· en· W1974917344 on OpenAlexaff
Inti Zlobec, Parham Minoo, Daniel Baumhoer, Kristi Baker, Luigi Terracciano, Jeremy R. Jass, Alessandro Lugli

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineColorectal cancerLymph nodeOncologyInternal medicineCancerPhenotypeGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of stage II colon cancer underlines the need for identifying high-risk, lymph node-negative patients. The objective of this study was to define a multimarker prognostic model of 5-year survival in patients with lymph node-negative, mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for 13 tumor markers was performed on 587 lymph node-negative, MMR-proficient CRC samples by using a tissue microarray. Immunoreactivity was evaluated semiquantitatively. A receiver-operating characteristic-based approach was used to detect clinically relevant tumor markers and to determine cutoff scores for tumor positivity. Univariate and multivariate analyses stratified by pathologic T3 (pT3) or pT4 tumor classification were performed. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the absence of CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (P < .001), loss of p27 (P = .006), positive urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) expression (P = .002), and positive uPA receptor (uPAR) expression (P = .037) were associated with an adverse prognosis. In multivariate analysis, CD8 (P = .001), p27 (P = .031), and uPA (P = .014) were independent prognostic factors. The multimarker phenotype of negative CD8, loss of p27, and positive uPA expression led to significantly worse survival compared with all other combinations of these features. Stratified by pT3 or pT4 stage, CD8 (P = .006) and uPA (P = .011) had independent prognostic value. Combined CD8 negativity and uPA positivity led to a more adverse prognosis in both patients with pT3 tumors and patients with pT4 tumors (P < .001). No difference was observed in the length of survival between patients with pT3 tumors who had CD8 negativity and uPA positivity and patients with pT4 tumors (P = .267). CONCLUSIONS: The multimarker phenotype of the absence of CD8+ TILs, loss of p27, and positive uPA expression was predictive of an adverse prognosis in patients with lymph node-negative, MMR-proficient CRC. The current findings suggested that a subgroup of patients with high-risk, lymph node-negative pT3 tumors should be considered for adjuvant therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207