MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974945034 · doi:10.1063/1.2409622

Influence of vibrations on thermodiffusion in binary mixture: A benchmark of numerical solutions

2007· article· en· W1974945034 on OpenAlexaff
Valentina Shevtsova, Denis Melnikov, Jean Claude Legros, Yushan Yan, M. Ziad Saghir, T. Lyubimova, G. A. Sedel’nikov, B. Roux

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicField-Flow Fractionation Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMechanicsBinary numberTemperature gradientThermophoresisResidualDiffusionThermodynamicsConvectionClassical mechanicsHeat transfer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Double-diffusive and vibrational convection with the Soret effect is considered in a cubic rigid cell filled with water (90%) and isopropanol (10%), subjected to a temperature difference between opposite lateral walls. Numerical simulations are carried out for g-jitter induced flow. The direction of g-jitter is the same as the residual gravity vector, which is perpendicular to the applied temperature gradient. Along with various combinations of static and oscillatory components, vibrations with two different frequencies are examined: (a) when the period of oscillations is smaller than any characteristic time (viscous, thermal, and diffusion), f=0.2Hz; (b) when the period of oscillations is comparable with viscous time, f=0.01Hz. Component separation due to the Soret effect under these driving actions is analyzed. The concept of time-averaged models is applied for the explanation of the high-frequency results. The interplay between the mean and fluctuating motions is discussed. Three research groups performed a benchmark of numerical solutions of three-dimensional Navier-Stokes, energy, and concentration equations using the true physical parameters for a future Space experiment. The objective of this paper is twofold: (i) to carry out an accurate study of heat and mass transfer in a binary liquid with the Soret effect in the presence of steady residual gravity and its oscillatory component; (ii) to carry out a benchmark of numerical solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicField-Flow Fractionation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207