MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975010410 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.162501

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>Reaction and Oxygen-Neon Novae

2003· article· lv· W1975010410 on OpenAlex
S. Bishop, R.E. Azuma, L. Buchmann, A. A. Chen, M.L. Chatterjee, J.M. D’Auria, Sabine Engel, D. Gigliotti, U. Greife, M. Hernanz, D. Hunter, A.M. Hussein, D.A. Hutcheon, C. Jewett, Jule Griebrok Jose, J.D. King, S. Kubono, A.M. Laird, M Lamey, R. Lewis, Weizhi Liu, S. Michimasa, Å. Olin, D. Ottewell, P. D. Parker, Joseph G. Rogers, F. Strieder, C. Wrede

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of TorontoUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The $^{21}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{22}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{g}$ reaction is expected to play an important role in the nucleosynthesis of $^{22}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}$ in oxygen-neon novae. The decay of $^{22}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}$ leads to the emission of a characteristic 1.275 MeV gamma-ray line. This report provides the first direct measurement of the rate of this reaction using a radioactive $^{21}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}$ beam, and discusses its astrophysical implications. The energy of the important state was measured to be ${E}_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{.}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{.}}=205.7\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.5\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$ with a resonance strength $\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\gamma}=1.03\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}{0.16}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}{0.14}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{s}}\text{ }\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.008
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0090.009
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3570.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it