MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975129577 · doi:10.4141/cjss07076

Measurement and modeling of surface charge and cation binding in agricultural soil

2008· article· en· W1975129577 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kate M Taillon, William H. Hendershot

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicIron oxide chemistry and applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil waterAdsorptionChemistryMetalSurface chargeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Environmental chemistrySoil scienceGeologyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Models of metal adsorption have typically been developed and tested for soil components rather than whole soils and at cation concentrations higher than usual environmental conditions. This study investigates whether the non-ideal consistent competitive adsorption (NICA) model can be applied to ion binding in whole soils at low total metal concentrations. Surface charge was measured for 18 agricultural soils from southern Quebec over the pH range 3.5 to 8. The adsorption of Ca, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn was also measured for three total metal concentrations of 2, 5 and 10 mg L -1 at pH 6 in a 0.005 M Ca(ClO 4 ) 2 solution. NICA model parameters were solved for each soil using the surface charge and adsorption data and a non-linear least squares fitting routine. Two types of binding sites were identified: the first type had a pK a near 4 while the second type had a pK a near 7.5. The first type of binding site contributed the greater proportion of the variable charge over most of the pH range, and the second site was unimportant at the lower pHs. The surface charge was accurately described by the NICA model with a mean R 2 of 0.995. A mean of the surface charge parameters describing H + binding accounted for more than 95% of the variable charge on the soils. For individual soils, the NICA model gave a fit to the experimental data with mean R 2 values for Ca, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn of 1.00, 0.906, 0.879 (two concentrations only), 0.825 and 0.918 respectively. When mean adsorption parameters, instead of values determined for each soil individually, are used, the model gave mean R 2 s for Ca, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn of 0.938, 0.941, 0.998 (two concentrations only), 0.978 and 0.935. It seems that the NICA model can be used to describe the surface charge and adsorption of cations by whole soils. The mean adsorption parameters appear to describe the adsorption behavior of the soil nearly as well as the individually fitted parameters. This implies that mean parameters for these agricultural soils may provide satisfactory predictions for the adsorption behavior of similar soils. Key words: NICA model, NICCA, surface charge, cation binding, agricultural soil

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicIron oxide chemistry and applicationsFrench-language works237,207