Butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate latexes: adhesive properties
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate (BA/MMA) latexes of bimodal molecular weight and particle size distribution were prepared in a multi‐step process by seeded conventional emulsion and seeded miniemulsion polymerization. For the conventional emulsion case, a BA/MMA batch copolymerization was conducted as a first step (seed generation) and was followed by a monomer addition step to ensure particle growth. In a third step, a BA/MMA pre‐emulsified mixture was added to generate a second particle population. For the miniemulsion case, a BA/MMA copolymerization was carried out as a first step (seed generation) and was followed by a monomer addition step. The addition of a BA/MMA miniemulsion served to generate a bimodal particle size and molecular weight distribution. The final latexes were coated onto a polyethylene terephthalate carrier, dried and their performance as pressure‐sensitive adhesives was evaluated using tack, peel and shear adhesion measurements. Structure‐property relationships between the adhesive properties and the weight‐average molecular weight and average particle size were examined. Even though the polymers obtained by miniemulsion showed better shear resistance, their shear resistance was low. There was no statistically significant difference in peel resistance of the polymers obtained by the two reactions. While a significant difference in tackiness between the two emulsion procedures was found when the adhesives were tested using the less sensitive, rolling ball test, no differences were found when they were tested using a loop tack test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it