Human short-term repopulating stem cells are efficiently detected following intrafemoral transplantation into NOD/SCID recipients depleted of CD122+ cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nonobese diabetic/severe combined immune deficiency (NOD/SCID) xenotransplantation model has emerged as a widely used assay for human hematopoietic stem cells; however, barriers still exist that limit engraftment. We previously identified a short-term SCID-repopulating cell (SRC) following direct intrafemoral injection into NOD/SCID mice, whereas others characterized similar SRCs using NOD/SCID mice depleted of natural killer (NK) cell activity. To determine the model that most efficiently detects short-term SRCs, we compared human engraftment in 6 different xenotransplantation models: NOD/SCID-beta2-microglobulin-null mice, anti-CD122 (interleukin-2 receptor beta [IL-2Rbeta])-treated or unmanipulated NOD/SCID mice, each given transplants by intravenous or intrafemoral injection. Human cell engraftment was highest in intrafemorally injected anti-CD122-treated NOD/SCID mice compared to all other groups at 2 and 6 weeks after transplantation. These modifications to the SRC assay provide improved detection of human stem cells and demonstrate that CD122+ cells provide barriers to stem cell engraftment, a finding with potential clinical relevance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it