MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of plasma lipid changes in response to 17β‐oestradiol stimulation on plasma growth hormone, somatostatin, and thyroid hormone levels in immature rainbow trout

2001· article· en· W1975268628 on OpenAlexaff
F. Mercure, Alison C. Holloway, Douglas R. Tocher, Mark A. Sheridan, Glen Van Der Kraak, J. F. Leatherland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologySomatostatinVitellogeninRainbow troutHormoneStimulationBiochemistryFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plasma total lipids were significantly higher in 17β‐oestradiol(E2)‐treated immature rainbow troutOncorhynchus mykissat week 4 after implantation, due to increases in polar and neutral lipids. The lipid classes responding were phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylethanolamine, sterols and sterol esters, in a proportion that approximately reflected the increase in plasma vitellogenin (VtG) levels as measured by a non‐competitive enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Plasma non‐esterified fatty acids and triacylglycerol were not affected by E2treatment. Plasma growth hormone GH levels were increased, and plasma somatostatin‐14 (SRIF) levels decreased in E2‐treated fish, responses which could be secondary to elevated plasma lipid (VtG) content, although a direct E2action on somatotroph function is possible. Plasma T4concentrations were not affected by E2treatment, but plasma T3concentrations were significantly lower than in controls 1 week after implantation when plasma E2concentrations were the highest; this is in support of the hypothesis that E2has a suppressive action on T3production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish BiologySame topicAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthFrench-language works237,207