Plant Protein Proteinase Inhibitors: Structure and Mechanism of Inhibition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review outlines known examples of the three-dimensional structures of protein proteinase inhibitors from plants. Three families of enzymes, serine proteinases, carboxypeptidases and cysteine proteinases, are targeted by at least a dozen inhibitor families, with the majority of them adopting the standard mechanism of inhibition towards the serine proteinases. All of the inhibitors discussed maintain compact and stable inhibitory domains that bind to the active site of their target proteinases and prevent access to the substrate molecules. One interesting highlight is the knottin group. Three separate inhibitor families utilize the overall knottin fold in a different way. This fold can accommodate extensive sequence variation and for each of the squash, Mirabilis and Potato carboxypeptidase families, the proteinase-binding residues are found at a different location. Plants have also evolved additional strategies to regulate proteinase activity, such as linking inhibitory domains and targeting multiple enzymes at once. The structural aspects of these strategies are discussed in the review. Keywords: Plant protein proteinase inhibitor, three-dimensional structure, reactive-site loop, standard mechanism, Inhibition mechanism, plant protease inhibitors, serine proteinases, carboxypeptidases, inhibitor families, cysteine proteinases, inhibitory domains, Mirabilis, knottin group, suppositions, tissue, NMR methods, X-ray
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it