MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Uric Acid and Insulin Sensitivity and Risk of Incident Hypertension

2009· article· en· W1975298229 on OpenAlex
John P. Forman, Hyon K. Choi, Gary C. Curhan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Internal Medicine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of HealthAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsOdds ratioMedicineInternal medicineUric acidEndocrinologyConfidence intervalInsulinPopulationHomocysteineDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Uric acid, insulin sensitivity, and endothelial dysfunction may be important in the development of hypertension. Corresponding circulating biomarkers are associated with risk of hypertension, but because these factors may be interrelated, whether they independently affect risk is unknown. METHODS: In 1496 women aged 32 to 52 years without hypertension at baseline, we prospectively analyzed the associations between fasting plasma levels of uric acid, insulin, triglycerides, the insulin sensitivity index, and 2 biomarkers associated with endothelial dysfunction (homocysteine and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1) and the odds of incident hypertension. Odds ratios were adjusted for standard risk factors and then for all biomarkers plus estimated glomerular filtration rate and total cholesterol level. Population-attributable risk was estimated for biomarkers significantly associated with hypertension. RESULTS: All the biomarkers were associated with incident hypertension after adjustment for standard hypertension risk factors. However, after simultaneously controlling for all the biomarkers, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and total cholesterol level, only uric acid and insulin levels were independently associated with incident hypertension. Comparing the highest and lowest quartiles of uric acid levels, the odds ratio was 1.89 (95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.82). A similar comparison yielded an odds ratio of 2.03 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-3.05) for insulin levels. Using an estimated basal incidence rate of 14.6 per 1000 annually, 30.8% of all hypertension occurring in young women annually is associated with uric acid levels of 3.4 mg/dL or greater (to convert to micromoles per liter, multiply by 59.485). For insulin levels of 2.9 microIU/mL or greater (to convert to picomoles per liter, multiply by 6.945), this proportion is 24.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in uric acid and insulin levels robustly and substantially affect the risk of hypertension in young women. Measuring these biomarkers in clinical practice may identify higher-risk individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it