Global Parameter and Helioseismic Tests of Solar Variability Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We construct models of the structure and evolution of the Sun which include variable magnetic fields and turbulence. The magnetic effects are (1) magnetic pressure, (2) magnetic energy, and (3) magnetic modulation to turbulence. The effects of turbulence are (1) turbulent pressure, (2) turbulent kinetic energy, and (3) turbulent inhibition of the radiative energy loss of a convective eddy, and (4) turbulent generation of magnetic fields. Using these ingredients we construct five types of solar variability models (including the standard solar model) with magnetic effects. These models are in part based on three-dimensional numerical simulations of the superadiabatic layers near the surface of the Sun. The models are tested with several sets of observational data, namely, the changes of (1) the total solar irradiance, (2) the photospheric temperature, (3) radius, (4) the position of the convection zone base, and (5) low- and medium-degree solar oscillation frequencies. We find that turbulence plays a major role in solar variability, and only a model that includes a magnetically modulated turbulent mechanism can agree with all the current available observational data. We find that because of the somewhat poor quality of all observations (other than the helioseismological ones), we need all data sets in order to restrict the range of models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it