Pluronic block copolymers and Pluronic poly(acrylic acid) microgels in oral delivery of megestrol acetate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several Pluronic-based formulations were studied in-vitro and in a rat model with respect to the release and bioavailability of megestrol acetate (MA) after oral administration. It was demonstrated that an aqueous, micellar formulation comprising a mixture of a hydrophobic (L61) and a hydrophilic (F127) Pluronic copolymer, significantly enhanced the bioavailability of MA administered orally at relatively low doses (1-7 mg kg(-1)). Pluronic-based microgels (spherical gel particles of sub-millimetre size) were introduced as MA vehicles. The microgels comprised a cross-linked network of poly(acrylic acid) onto which the Pluronic chains were covalently attached. Microgels of Pluronic L92 and poly(acrylic acid) fabricated into tablet dosage forms exhibited dramatically lowered MA initial burst release. The MA release was pH-dependent owing to the pH sensitivity of the microgel swelling, with the drug retained by the microgel at pH 1.8 and released slowly at pH 6.8. In the rat model, a significant increase in MA bioavailability was observed when the microgel-formulated MA was administered orally at a high dose of 10 mg kg(-1), owing to the enhanced retention of the microgel. The study of the microgel passage through the gastrointestinal tract demonstrated the microgel retention characteristic of a very high molecular weight polymer and the absence of any systemic absorption of the polymer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".