Cyclosporin twice or three times daily dosing in pediatric transplant patients – It is not the same!
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Not infrequently, physicians elect to divide CyA-ME from b.i.d. to t.i.d. dosing in an effort to minimize toxicity. Equivalent exposure is assumed. Few studies have compared 24-h PK profiles on both dosing regimes in the same patient. We retrospectively studied a heterogeneous population of seven pediatric patients (one heart transplant, five renal transplants and one FSGS patient) on both dosing regimes who had complete 24-h PK profiles on CyA-ME. Four patients were converted from b.i.d. to t.i.d. and three patients from t.i.d. to b.i.d. dosing. There was no difference in the dose/kg (5.66 +/- 2.52 mg/kg on b.i.d. dosing and 5.75 +/- 1.81 mg/kg on t.i.d. dosing, p = 0.8578, two-sided t-test). When comparing the dose-normalized AUCs over 24 h, every single patient demonstrated lower CyA-ME exposure on t.i.d. than on b.i.d. dosing with an average relative bioavailability that was 37.9% lower on t.i.d. than on b.i.d. dosing. The median dose-normalized AUC(0-->24h) dropped from 1620 ng x h x kg/mL x mg (range: 1253-4319) on b.i.d. to 1016 ng x h x kg/mL x mg (range: 712-1485, p = 0.02, Wilcoxon's matched pairs test) on t.i.d. dosing. Our results indicate t.i.d. dosing of CyA-ME results in significantly lower exposure when the same total dose is administered in two divided doses. This reduced exposure may potentially increase the risk for rejection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".