The Impact of Intake Dilution and Combustion Phasing on the Combustion Stability of a Diesel Engine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Conventionally, the diesel fuel ignites spontaneously following the injection event. The combustion and injection often overlap with a very short ignition delay. Diesel engines therefore offer superior combustion stability characterized by the low cycle-to-cycle variations. However, the enforcement of the stringent emission regulations necessitates the implementation of innovative diesel combustion concepts such as the low temperature combustion (LTC) to achieve ultra-low engine-out pollutants. In stark contrast to the conventional diesel combustion, the enabling of LTC requires enhanced air fuel mixing and hence a longer ignition delay is desired. Such a decoupling of the combustion events from the fuel injection can potentially cause ignition discrepancy and ultimately lead to combustion cyclic variations.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">This work investigates the impact of exhaust gas recirculation and combustion phasing on the combustion stability and cyclic variations of a diesel engine while entering into the LTC operation regime using a single-injection fueling strategy. Experiments are conducted on a laboratory instrumented high compression ratio (18.2:1) diesel engine. The combustion phasing control and the application of moderate-to-high EGR are used to achieve ultra-low NOx and smoke emissions. The combustion characteristics and emission performance are presented. Cycle-resolved cylinder pressure measurements acquired for 200 engine cycles are used to evaluate indicated engine performance and apparent heat release parameters including ignition delay, burn duration, combustion phasing, and the pressure rise rate. The results indicate that the enabling of single-injection diesel LTC demands precise control over operating conditions and it is sensitive to minor variations in the injection timing and the amount of EGR applied. However, when successfully controlled, this combustion mode exhibits cyclic variability comparable to conventional diesel combustion.</div></div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".